Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for uprobes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]:

> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest 
> > uprobes patches:
> > 
> > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS)
> 
> this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo?


I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th.

Ingo,

	Since you had asked me to send the patch series again after
handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. At that time, I had
handled this change as part of a comment from Stephen Boyd.  I had
mentioned this in the changelog.

	Would it be possible for you to accept the patches from 
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/109
with message id: 
Message-Id: <20120416091936.19174.2641.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Currently you seem to have picked from 
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/11/117

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]