* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]: > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest > > > uprobes patches: > > > > > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS) > > > > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo? > > > I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th. > > Ingo, > > Since you had asked me to send the patch series again > after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...] Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that instead of rebasing the branch. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>