On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I tested your patch,but the bug is still. > > I think the code may be is: > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index ffe13fd..d66afc4 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info) > struct kmem_cache *s = info; > struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu); > > - return !!(c->page); > + return !!(c->page || c->partial); > } You are very right. I shouldn't be sending patches before the first morning coffee... I take it this last version of the patch fixes the issue? if so it should should go as a fix into 3.4-rc7 Thanks, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388 US Cell: +1-973-8260388 http://benyossef.com "If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href