On 16.02.23 16:30, Peter Xu wrote: > Nick Bowler reported another sparc64 breakage after the young/dirty > persistent work for page migration (per "Link:" below). That's after a > similar report [2]. Thx for handling this. > [...] > > Note: this is based on mm-unstable, because the breakage was since 6.1 and > we're at a very late stage of 6.2 (-rc8), so I assume for this specific > case we should target this at 6.3. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021160603.GA23307@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221212130213.136267-1-david@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Cc: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Not that it matters much, but feel free to use this instead: CC: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Then things don't depend on me (in case I ever get help with my cat herding job). And it also make it even more obvious that this patch fixes a regression to anyone who handles it downstream. > Fixes: 2e3468778dbe ("mm: remember young/dirty bit for page migrations") That's a commit from 6.1, hence this should likely have: Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.1.y [no, a fixes tag alone does not suffice, see docs] > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADyTPExpEqaJiMGoV+Z6xVgL50ZoMJg49B10LcZ=8eg19u34BA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Reported-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxx> > [...] Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
