On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:37:19 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16.02.23 16:30, Peter Xu wrote: > > Nick Bowler reported another sparc64 breakage after the young/dirty > > persistent work for page migration (per "Link:" below). That's after a > > similar report [2]. > > > > It turns out page migration was overlooked, and it wasn't failing before > > because page migration was not enabled in the initial report test environment. > > > > David proposed another way [2] to fix this from sparc64 side, but that > > patch didn't land somehow. > > I pinged another time and asked Andrew to pick it up eventually. > urgh, sorry, I'd have filtered that out as a sparc patch.
