On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 16.02.23 16:30, Peter Xu wrote: > > Nick Bowler reported another sparc64 breakage after the young/dirty > > persistent work for page migration (per "Link:" below). That's after a > > similar report [2]. > > Thx for handling this. > > > [...] > > > > Note: this is based on mm-unstable, because the breakage was since 6.1 and > > we're at a very late stage of 6.2 (-rc8), so I assume for this specific > > case we should target this at 6.3. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021160603.GA23307@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221212130213.136267-1-david@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Cc: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Not that it matters much, but feel free to use this instead: > > CC: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Then things don't depend on me (in case I ever get help with my cat > herding job). And it also make it even more obvious that this patch > fixes a regression to anyone who handles it downstream. Sure. > > > Fixes: 2e3468778dbe ("mm: remember young/dirty bit for page migrations") > > That's a commit from 6.1, hence this should likely have: > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.1.y > > [no, a fixes tag alone does not suffice, see docs] Oops, I just forgot that. We definitely need to cc:stable. I'll make sure it's there if there's a new version, or I hope Andrew could help to attach otherwise. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
