On 26.03.22 21:49, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds >> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to >>>> you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever >>>> be. >>> >>> So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in >>> linux-next, has it? >> >> No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I >> was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM >> developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no >> strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position. > > hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail > rules :( > > Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next. I thought we decided to do > that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox? > I'd appreciate if we could merge most MM-related stuff through the -MM tree; it exists for a reason IMHO. Andrew, you usually have a very good feeling when something's ready to be merged upstream (sufficient review from relevant folks, sufficient exposure via -mm and -next, ...). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
