On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 2:49 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds > > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to > > > > you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever > > > > be. > > > > > > So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in > > > linux-next, has it? > > > > No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I > > was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM > > developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no > > strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position. > > hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail > rules :( > > Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next. I thought we decided to do > that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox? Will do. > Also, sorry, but I'm not seeing many commonly-seen names amongst the > reviewers. I'd be more comfortable if people who have done most work on > page reclaim up to this time have had time to review and comment. Me too :) Unfortunately I can't dictate others' priorities or methodologies. So I have reset my expectations from getting their reviewed-by's to not getting their NAKs.
