Re: [page-reclaim] Re: [GIT PULL] Multi-gen LRU for 5.18-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to
> > > you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever
> > > be.
> >
> > So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in
> > linux-next, has it?
> 
> No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I
> was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM
> developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no
> strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position.

hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail
rules :(

Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next.  I thought we decided to do
that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox?

Also, sorry, but I'm not seeing many commonly-seen names amongst the
reviewers.  I'd be more comfortable if people who have done most work on
page reclaim up to this time have had time to review and comment.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux