Re: [patch v2] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> To sum up. There are 3 patches flying around at the moment.
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/68576
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/68577
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/68583
> 
> They are approaching the problem by thawing oom selected frozen task.
> 
> Tejun mentioned his work (sorry I do not have a link to patches) that
> should enable direct killing frozen tasks. This would mean that we do
> not need any special handling from the OOM code paths AFAIU. This would
> be much better of course and I guess we can wait for them for 3.2.
> 
> Does this make sense?

I don't find any bad in the idea. So, I have two questions.

 o Who are writing such patch now?

 o Should we drop current drientjes patch?


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]