Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, slub: don't combine pr_err with INFO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/8/21 6:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> It is strange to combine "pr_err" with "INFO", so let's remove the
>> prefix completely.
> 
> So is this the right thing to do?  Should it be pr_info() instead?
> Many of these messages do not appear to be error messages, but
> rather informational messages.

They are all part of longer error reports. See
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0b2f4419-06a9-0b6c-067b-8d0848e78c33@xxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux