Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, slub: don't combine pr_err with INFO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> It is strange to combine "pr_err" with "INFO", so let's remove the
> prefix completely.

So is this the right thing to do?  Should it be pr_info() instead?
Many of these messages do not appear to be error messages, but
rather informational messages.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux