Hello,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:46:20AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:28:27 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Alex, please consider why the authors of these lines (whom you
> > did not Cc) chose to write them without BUG_ON(): it has always
> > been preferred practice to use BUG_ON() on predicates, but not on
> > functionally effective statements (sorry, I've forgotten the proper
> > term: I'd say statements with side-effects, but here they are not
> > just side-effects: they are their main purpose).
> >
> > We prefer not to hide those away inside BUG macros
>
> Should we change that? I find BUG_ON(something_which_shouldnt_fail())
> to be quite natural and readable.
>
> As are things like the existing
>
> BUG_ON(mmap_read_trylock(mm));
> BUG_ON(wb_domain_init(&global_wb_domain, GFP_KERNEL));
>
> etc.
>
>
> No strong opinion here, but is current mostly-practice really
> useful?
I'd be surprised if the kernel can boot with BUG_ON() defined as "do
{}while(0)" so I guess it doesn't make any difference.
I've no strong opinion either, but personally my views matches Hugh's
views on this. I certainly tried to stick to that in the past since I
find it cleaner if a bugcheck just "checks" and can be deleted at any
time without sudden breakage.
Said that I also guess we're in the minority.
Thanks,
Andrea
