Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:50:44AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:22:39 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Imran Khan reported a regression in hackbench results caused by the
> > commit f2fe7b09a52b ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
> > instead of pages").
> 
> How large was the regression?

~16% according to Imran's data.

> 
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -3122,9 +3122,7 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> >  	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> >  		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages);
> >  
> > -	page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> > -	if (do_memsw_account())
> > -		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> > +	refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
> >  }
> 
> IOW, which kernel version(s) should we be patching?

5.9+

Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux