Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:22:39 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Imran Khan reported a regression in hackbench results caused by the
> commit f2fe7b09a52b ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
> instead of pages").

How large was the regression?

> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3122,9 +3122,7 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
>  	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
>  		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages);
>  
> -	page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
> -	if (do_memsw_account())
> -		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> +	refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
>  }

IOW, which kernel version(s) should we be patching?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux