Re: [Patch] numa: introduce CONFIG_NUMA_SYSFS for drivers/base/node.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



于 2011年08月26日 04:57, David Rientjes 写道:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Cong Wang wrote:

No, it doesn't work, CONFIG_HUGETLBFS can be enabled with CONFIG_NUMA=y
and CONFIG_SYSFS=n and that uses data structures from drivers/base/node.c
which doesn't get compiled with this patch.

So, you mean with CONFIG_NUMA=y&&  CONFIG_SYSFS=n&&  CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y
we still get compile error?

Which data structures are used by hugetlbfs?


node_states[], which is revealed at link time if you tried to compile your
patch.  It's obvious that we don't want to add per-node hugetlbfs
attributes to sysfs directories if sysfs is disabled, so you need to
modify the hugetlbfs code as well.

Makes sense. Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]