Re: [Patch] numa: introduce CONFIG_NUMA_SYSFS for drivers/base/node.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



于 2011年08月25日 13:04, David Rientjes 写道:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:

Below is the updated version.

Thanks for testing!

Yes, that works after changing #ifdef defined(...)
to #if defined(...)

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


No, it doesn't work, CONFIG_HUGETLBFS can be enabled with CONFIG_NUMA=y
and CONFIG_SYSFS=n and that uses data structures from drivers/base/node.c
which doesn't get compiled with this patch.

So, you mean with CONFIG_NUMA=y && CONFIG_SYSFS=n && CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y
we still get compile error?

Which data structures are used by hugetlbfs?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]