On 11.8.2011 15:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 11-08-11 14:51:33, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Wed 10-08-11 17:12:40, Michal Marek wrote: >>> Introduced in 3.1-rc1, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) expands to a true value >>> iff CONFIG_NUMA is set. This makes it easier to grep for code that >>> depends on CONFIG_NUMA. > > I have just looked closer at all available macros. Wouldn't it make more > sense to use IS_BUILTIN instead? Both symbols can be only on or off. > Not that it would make any difference in the end. I even like IS_ENABLED > naming more. IS_ENABLED() and IS_BUILTIN() are equivalent for boolean symbols. IS_BUILTIN() and IS_MODULE() are meant for the (rare) case when someone needs to distinguish between built in and module for tristate options in the code. Michal -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>