On Thu 11-08-11 14:51:33, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 10-08-11 17:12:40, Michal Marek wrote: > > Introduced in 3.1-rc1, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) expands to a true value > > iff CONFIG_NUMA is set. This makes it easier to grep for code that > > depends on CONFIG_NUMA. I have just looked closer at all available macros. Wouldn't it make more sense to use IS_BUILTIN instead? Both symbols can be only on or off. Not that it would make any difference in the end. I even like IS_ENABLED naming more. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>