Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Something like so? Compiles and runs the benchmark in question.

Oh, and can you do this with a commit log and sign-off, and I'll put
it in my "anon_vma-locking" branch that I have. I'm not going to
actually merge that branch into mainline until I've seen a few more
acks or more testing by Tim.

But if Tim's numbers hold up (-32% to +15% performance by just the
first one, and +15% isn't actually an improvement since tmpfs
read-ahead should have gotten us to +66%), I think we have to do this
just to avoid the performance regression.

                                     Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]