Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 18:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 09:18 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > And in general it looks like blind conversion from spinlock to mutex
> > is a bad idea right now.
> 
> For 4 socket machines, maybe. On 2 sockets I cannot reproduce anything.
> 
> I wonder if its the fairness thing, the mutex spinners aren't fifo fair
> like the ticket locks are. It could be significant with larger socket
> count since their cacheline arbitration is more sucky.
> 
> 
> 

Peter,

Wonder if you can provide the profile on your run so I can compare with
what I got on 4 sockets?

Thanks.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]