On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:12 -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > Thanks to Andi for providing the info. We've used this workaround in > our testing so it will not mask true kernel scaling bottlenecks. http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/39-2.txt.bz2 http://programming.kicks-ass.net/sekrit/tip-2.txt.bz2 tip+sirq+linus is still slightly faster than .39 here, although removing that sysconf() wreckage closed the gap considerably (needing to know the number of cpus to optimize locking sounds like a trainwreck all of its own, needing it _that_ often instead of just once at startup is even worse). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href