On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:19 AM Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > To be clear, you're correct that this wasn't intended to result in any changes > on cgroup v1, so I'm not against the change. Especially for stable, though, I'd > like to understand what the real results and ramifications are here. As explained above, the user tool parsing memory.oom_control is affected by this behavioral change, and what's worse is there is no documentation on it. I'm not agaist it if we think that is not enough to cc:stable. Thanks Yafang
