Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yafang,

Yafang Shao writes:
A recent commit 9852ae3fe529 ("mm, memcg: consider subtrees in
memory.events") changes the behavior of memcg events, which will
consider subtrees in memory.events. But oom_kill event is a special one
as it is used in both cgroup1 and cgroup2. In cgroup1, it is displayed
in memory.oom_control. The file memory.oom_control is in both root memcg
and non root memcg, that is different with memory.event as it only in
non-root memcg. That commit is okay for cgroup2, but it is not okay for
cgroup1 as it will cause inconsistent behavior between root memcg and
non-root memcg.
Let's recover the original behavior for cgroup1.

Can you please explain the practical ramifications of this and show an explicitly laid out example of how this manifests, with numbers and scenarios? It's unclear to me that this is a real problem as is -- it may be, but there certainly needs to be more information.

Thanks,

Chris




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux