Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
From: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:19:21 +0100
Cc: hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx, vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200413193111.GA1559372@chrisdown.name>
References: <20200412140427.6732-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <20200413193111.GA1559372@chrisdown.name>

To be clear, you're correct that this wasn't intended to result in any changeson cgroup v1, so I'm not against the change. Especially for stable, though, I'dlike to understand what the real results and ramifications are here.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
  - From: Yafang Shao

References:
- [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
  - From: Chris Down

Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 0/2] memcg, vmpressure: expose vmpressure controls
Next by Date: [PATCH v1 2/2] memcg, vmpressure: expose vmpressure controls
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux