On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 12:41:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > > > While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim > > modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with > > __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not > > always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for > > GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used > > non-sleepable allocation masks. > > > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> thanks, - Joel
