On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim > modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with > __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not > always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for > GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used > non-sleepable allocation masks. > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
