[PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:35:41 +0200
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,
while discussing [1] it turned out that we could be more explicit in gfp
flags documentation. The following two patches do that. There are no
functional changes introduced.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200331131628.153118-1-joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations
  - From: Michal Hocko
- [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
  - From: Michal Hocko

Prev by Date: [RFC] mm/memory.c: Optimizing THP zeroing routine for !HIGHMEM cases
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
Previous by thread: [RFC] mm/memory.c: Optimizing THP zeroing routine for !HIGHMEM cases
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux