On 6/10/11, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:38:06 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro > <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm: fail GFP_DMA allocations when ZONE_DMA is not >> configured" > > Confused. We reverted this over a week ago. Should one submit a patch adding a warning to GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA, or the idea of the original patch is wrong? -- With best wishes Dmitry -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>