On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That is NOT an unreasonable request, but it seems that its far too much > > to ask of you. > > Full ack. > > David, > > stop that nonsense already. You changed the behaviour and broke stuff > which was working fine before for whatever reason. That behaviour was > in the kernel for ages and we tolerated the abuse. > Did I nack this patch and not realize it? Does my patch fix the warning for pxaficp_ir that would still be emitted with this patch? If the driver uses GFP_DMA and nobody from the arm side is prepared to remove it yet, then I'd suggest merging my patch until that can be determined. Otherwise, you have no guarantees about where the memory is actually coming from. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>