On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:47 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:00 AM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker >> > is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently >> > all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two: >> >> Actually, this is not true. huge_zero_page_shrinker is NOT numa-aware. >> deferred_split_shrinker is numa-aware. >> > > But both huge_zero_page_shrinker and huge_zero_page_shrinker are not > memcg-aware shrinkers. I think Kirill is saying all memcg-aware > shrinkers are also numa-aware shrinkers. Aha, thanks for reminding. Yes, I missed that memcg-aware part. > > Shakeel
