On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:47 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:00 AM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker > > is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently > > all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two: > > Actually, this is not true. huge_zero_page_shrinker is NOT numa-aware. > deferred_split_shrinker is numa-aware. > But both huge_zero_page_shrinker and huge_zero_page_shrinker are not memcg-aware shrinkers. I think Kirill is saying all memcg-aware shrinkers are also numa-aware shrinkers. Shakeel
