Hello, On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > I am sorry but I do not follow. Besides that modeling the behavior on > panic_on_oom doesn't really sound very appealing to me. The knob is a > crude hack mostly motivated by debugging (at least its non-global > variants). Hmm... we actually do use that quite a bit in production (moving away from it gradually). > So can we get back to workloads and shape the semantic on top of that > please? I didn't realize we were that off track. Don't both map to what we were discussing almost perfectly? Thanks. -- tejun
