On 03/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 03/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > On 03/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > It is not tested. I do not pretend I really understand oom-killer in > > > all details (although oom_kill.c itself is quite trivial). > > > > > > The patch assumes that > > > > > > oom-prevent-unnecessary-oom-kills-or-kernel-panics.patch > > > oom-skip-zombies-when-iterating-tasklist.patch > > > > > > are dropped. > > > > > > I think, this patch __might__ address the problems described in the > > > changelog, but of course I am not sure. > > > > > > I am relying on your and Kosaki's review, if you disagree with this > > > change I won't argue. > > > > And another uncompiled/untested/needs_review patch which might help. > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > I meant, compile-tested only ;) > > > Nobody ever argued, the current PF_EXITING check is not very good. > > I do not know how much it is useful, but we can at least improve it. Argh. Sorry for noise, I am sending v2. Changes: - fix the typo in mm_is_exiting(), s/p/t/ - update the changelog Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>