On 03/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 03/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > It is not tested. I do not pretend I really understand oom-killer in
> > all details (although oom_kill.c itself is quite trivial).
> >
> > The patch assumes that
> >
> > oom-prevent-unnecessary-oom-kills-or-kernel-panics.patch
> > oom-skip-zombies-when-iterating-tasklist.patch
> >
> > are dropped.
> >
> > I think, this patch __might__ address the problems described in the
> > changelog, but of course I am not sure.
> >
> > I am relying on your and Kosaki's review, if you disagree with this
> > change I won't argue.
>
> And another uncompiled/untested/needs_review patch which might help.
^^^^^^^^^^
I meant, compile-tested only ;)
> Nobody ever argued, the current PF_EXITING check is not very good.
> I do not know how much it is useful, but we can at least improve it.
>
> Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>