On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So do you want to do a straight revert of these that went in for 4.15:
I think that's the right thing to do, but would want to verify that
there are no *other* issues than just the attempt at PKRU.
The commit message does talk about PAGE_USER, and as mentioned I do
think that's a good thing to check, I just don't think it should be
done this way,
Was there something else going behind these commits? Because if not,
let's revert and then perhaps later introduce a more targeted thing?
Also, aren't the protection keys encoded in the vma?
Because *if* we want to check protection keys, I think we should do
that at the vma layer, partly exactly because the exact implementation
of protection keys is so architecture-specific, and partly because I
don't think it makes sense to check them for every page anyway.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
