On 2/26/16 07:12, SeongJae Park wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Chen Gang wrote: > >> >> git is a tool mainly for analyzing code, but not mainly for normal >> reading main code. >> >> So for me, the coding styles need not consider about git. > > > It is common to see reject of trivial coding style fixup patch here and > there. Those patches usually be merged for early stage files that only > few people read / write. However, for files that are old and lots of > people read and write, those patches are rejected in usual. I mean, the > negative opinions for this patches are usual in this community. > > I agree that coding style is important and respect your effort. However, > because the code will be seen and written by most kernel hackers, the file > should be maintained to be easily readable and writable by most kernel > hackers, especially, maintainers. What I want to say is, we should > respect maintainers' opinion in usual. > Yes we need consider about the maintainers' options. And my another ideas are replied in the other thread, please check, and welcome any ideas, suggestion, and completions. Thanks. -- Chen Gang (陈刚) Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>