On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:48:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > And by the way I disagreed completely that this is a problem. And you > > never demonstrated that it is a problem. > > > > It's totally unproductive to say things like it implements its own > > "NUMAness" aside from the page allocator. I can say SLUB implements its > > own "numaness" because it is checking for objects matching NUMA > > requirements too. > > SLAB implement numa policies etc in the SLAB logic. It has its own rotor > now. We all know. I am saying it is unproductive because you just claim that it is some fundamental problem without why it is a problem. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>