On Mon, 24 May 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: > Well I'm glad you've conceded that queues are useful for high > performance computing, and that higher order allocations are not > a free and unlimited resource. Ahem. I have never made any such claim and would never make them. And "conceding" something ??? The "unqueueing" was the result of excessive queue handling in SLAB due and the higher order allocations are a natural move in HPC to gain performance. > I hope we can move forward now with some objective, testable > comparisons and criteria for selecting one main slab allocator. If can find criteria that are universally agreed upon then yes but that is doubtful. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>