On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> memclear_highpage_flush has been changed over to
> zero_user_page for some time now. I think it's
> safe to say it's o.k. to remove all of it.
> (but correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> ---
> include/linux/highmem.h | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> index 74152c0..c77f913 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> @@ -173,12 +173,6 @@ static inline void zero_user(struct page *page,
> zero_user_segments(page, start, start + size, 0, 0);
> }
>
> -static inline void __deprecated memclear_highpage_flush(struct page *page,
> - unsigned int offset, unsigned int size)
> -{
> - zero_user(page, offset, size);
> -}
> -
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_COPY_USER_HIGHPAGE
>
> static inline void copy_user_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from,
> --
> 1.6.5.2.180.gc5b3e
>
>
no response on this yet..
is it safe to say this can go in
my reject pile?
--
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href