Hi, Krzysztof On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25/10/2023 03:56, Huacai Chen wrote: > > Hi, Krzysztof, > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:18 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:51:35 +0100, > >> Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Krzysztof & Marc: > >>> > >>> Sorry for the interruption. > >>> As said before, we tried to use the 'interrupt-map attribute' in our > >>> Loongson liointc dts(i), but there are some unfriendly points. > >>> Do you have any other different suggestions? > >> > >> I don't have any suggestion, but if you are still thinking of adding > >> some extra crap to the of_irq_imap_abusers[] array, the answer is a > >> firm 'NO'. > > Excuse me, but as described before, 'interrupt-map' cannot be used for > > liointc unless adding it to of_irq_imap_abusers[], can we still use > > 'parent_int_map' in this case? Or just change it to 'parent-int-map' > > to satisfy the naming style? > > Why do you respond to me? You received firm 'NO' about > of_irq_imap_abusers, so how adhering to naming style or violating naming > style has anything to do with it? I'm sorry but of_irq_imap_abusers is to make 'interrupt-map' to work, without of_irq_imap_abusers we can only use the existing 'parent_int_map'. We need your response because we want to know whether you can accept the existing method since the other approach has received 'NO'. And, changing 'parent_int_map' to 'parent-int-map' can be a little better, at least it satisfies the naming style. Huacai > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
