Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc: Fix warnings about liointc-2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 25/10/2023 03:56, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Krzysztof,
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:18 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:51:35 +0100,
>> Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof & Marc:
>>> Sorry for the interruption.
>>> As said before, we tried to use the 'interrupt-map attribute' in our
>>> Loongson liointc dts(i), but there are some unfriendly points.
>>> Do you have any other different suggestions?
>> I don't have any suggestion, but if you are still thinking of adding
>> some extra crap to the of_irq_imap_abusers[] array, the answer is a
>> firm 'NO'.
> Excuse me, but as described before, 'interrupt-map' cannot be used for
> liointc unless adding it to of_irq_imap_abusers[], can we still use
> 'parent_int_map' in this case? Or just change it to 'parent-int-map'
> to satisfy the naming style?

Why do you respond to me? You received firm 'NO' about
of_irq_imap_abusers, so how adhering to naming style or violating naming
style has anything to do with it?

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux