Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 21/03/2023 09:24, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> If we take the calling new things mediatek route, we will never get to
>>> the bottom of fixing the naming inconsistency.
>> All new things, so new SoCs, should be called mediatek, because there is
>> no ralink and mediatek is already used for them. So why some new
>> Mediatek SoCs are "mediatek" but some other also new SoCs are "ralink"?
>> You can do nothing (and no actual need) about existing inconsistency...
> I couldn't change ralink -> mediatek because company acquisitions don't 
> grant the change. I don't see any reason to prevent changing mediatek -> 
> ralink without breaking the ABI on the existing schemas.

You cannot change mediatek->ralink without breaking the ABI for the same

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux