On 21/03/2023 09:24, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>> >>> If we take the calling new things mediatek route, we will never get to >>> the bottom of fixing the naming inconsistency. >> >> All new things, so new SoCs, should be called mediatek, because there is >> no ralink and mediatek is already used for them. So why some new >> Mediatek SoCs are "mediatek" but some other also new SoCs are "ralink"? >> >> You can do nothing (and no actual need) about existing inconsistency... > > I couldn't change ralink -> mediatek because company acquisitions don't > grant the change. I don't see any reason to prevent changing mediatek -> > ralink without breaking the ABI on the existing schemas. You cannot change mediatek->ralink without breaking the ABI for the same reasons. Best regards, Krzysztof
