On 20/03/2023 18:57, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>> All of these are at the end the >>> way we can properly match compatible-data to write a proper driver. >>> The current ralink dtsi files which are in tree now >>> are totally incomplete and not documented so we are planning to align >> >> Nothing like this was said in commit msg, so how can we know? >> >>> all of this with openWRT used files and others soon. That's the reason >>> we are not touching >>> 'arch/mips/boot/dts' at all now. I don't think anybody is using any of >>> this but mt7621 which is properly completed and documented. >> >> Anyway, none of this explains exception from naming convention - vendor, >> device or family name. > > Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense? More, except: 1. This is not clock, but sysc. 2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM? Best regards, Krzysztof
