On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 21/03/2023 08:00, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - ralink,mt7620-sysc
> >>
> >> Since you decided to send it before we finish discussion:
> >> NAK - this is already used as mediatek
> >
> > Sorry, there was too much stuff commented so I preferred to clean up
> > all of them while maintaining the compatibles with the ralink prefix
> > instead since that was where the current discussion was at that point.
>
> You did not even wait for me to send feedback on this, in old thread.
My apologies, I thought it was better to send it at that point. Will
wait for feedback from now on before sending anything.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + - ralink,mt7620a-sysc
> >
> > As I have said, this one exists:
> >
> > arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c: rt_sysc_membase =
> > plat_of_remap_node("ralink,mt7620a-sysc");
>
> And why do you ignore others which have mediatek?
>
> >
> >
> >>> + - ralink,mt7628-sysc
> >>
> >> Same here.
>
> Same problem.
>
> >>
> >>> + - ralink,mt7688-sysc
> >>
> >> I expect you to check the others.
> >
> > I can change others to mediatek but that would be a bit weird, don't you think?
>
> No, I expect to have mediatek where the model is already used with
> mediatek prefix.
It is clear now, thanks.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks Krzysztof.
Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
