On 21/03/2023 08:00, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - ralink,mt7620-sysc
>>
>> Since you decided to send it before we finish discussion:
>> NAK - this is already used as mediatek
>
> Sorry, there was too much stuff commented so I preferred to clean up
> all of them while maintaining the compatibles with the ralink prefix
> instead since that was where the current discussion was at that point.
You did not even wait for me to send feedback on this, in old thread.
>
>>
>>> + - ralink,mt7620a-sysc
>
> As I have said, this one exists:
>
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c: rt_sysc_membase =
> plat_of_remap_node("ralink,mt7620a-sysc");
And why do you ignore others which have mediatek?
>
>
>>> + - ralink,mt7628-sysc
>>
>> Same here.
Same problem.
>>
>>> + - ralink,mt7688-sysc
>>
>> I expect you to check the others.
>
> I can change others to mediatek but that would be a bit weird, don't you think?
No, I expect to have mediatek where the model is already used with
mediatek prefix.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
