Re: [PATCH 1/2] Mips: ls2k1000: dts: add the display controller device node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2023/2/23 16:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/02/2023 09:40, suijingfeng wrote:
On 2023/2/23 15:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/02/2023 04:19, Sui jingfeng wrote:
Hi,

On 2023/2/23 02:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22/02/2023 17:55, suijingfeng wrote:
The display controller is a pci device, it's pci vendor id is
0x0014, it's pci device id is 0x7a06.

Signed-off-by: suijingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
    .../boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
    1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
index 8143a61111e3..a528af3977d9 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
@@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ memory@200000 {
    			<0x00000001 0x10000000 0x00000001 0xb0000000>; /* 6912 MB at 4352MB */
    	};
+ reserved-memory {
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		ranges;
+
+		display_reserved: framebuffer@30000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x0 0x30000000 0x0 0x04000000>; /* 64M */
+			linux,cma-default;
+		};
+	};
+
    	cpu_clk: cpu_clk {
    		#clock-cells = <0>;
    		compatible = "fixed-clock";
@@ -198,6 +210,15 @@ sata@8,0 {
    				interrupt-parent = <&liointc0>;
    			};
+ display-controller@6,0 {
+				compatible = "loongson,ls2k1000-dc";
+
+				reg = <0x3000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
+				interrupts = <28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
+				interrupt-parent = <&liointc0>;
+				memory-region = <&display_reserved>;
NAK.
Err :(,  please give me a chance to explain
Test your code against the bindings you send.
I can guarantee to you that I test may code more than twice. The code
used to testing is listed at link [1].
I wrote - test against the bindings. I don't believe that it was tested.
Please paste the output of the testing (dtbs_check).
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Do you see this                       ----------^^^^?

But you pasted:

I *do* run the test against the bindings and the test result say nothing.

I reset my modify today made, then re-run the test again.

I'm telling the truth: the test result say nothing. I paste the log at
below:

make -j$(nproc) ARCH=loongarch
CROSS_COMPILE=loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu- dt_binding_check
This -------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, I see it.

I means I have tested all of them as the instruction[1]!

the test log just say nothing.  I re-run it again and all passed.


[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/devicetree/writing-schema.html#:~:text=The%20DT%20schema%20project%20can%20be%20installed%20with,they%20are%20in%20your%20PATH%20%28~%2F.local%2Fbin%20by%20default%29.


Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux