Re: [PATCH 1/2] Mips: ls2k1000: dts: add the display controller device node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2023/2/23 15:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/02/2023 04:19, Sui jingfeng wrote:
Hi,

On 2023/2/23 02:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22/02/2023 17:55, suijingfeng wrote:
The display controller is a pci device, it's pci vendor id is
0x0014, it's pci device id is 0x7a06.

Signed-off-by: suijingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
index 8143a61111e3..a528af3977d9 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
@@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ memory@200000 {
   			<0x00000001 0x10000000 0x00000001 0xb0000000>; /* 6912 MB at 4352MB */
   	};
+ reserved-memory {
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		ranges;
+
+		display_reserved: framebuffer@30000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x0 0x30000000 0x0 0x04000000>; /* 64M */
+			linux,cma-default;
+		};
+	};
+
   	cpu_clk: cpu_clk {
   		#clock-cells = <0>;
   		compatible = "fixed-clock";
@@ -198,6 +210,15 @@ sata@8,0 {
   				interrupt-parent = <&liointc0>;
   			};
+ display-controller@6,0 {
+				compatible = "loongson,ls2k1000-dc";
+
+				reg = <0x3000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
+				interrupts = <28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
+				interrupt-parent = <&liointc0>;
+				memory-region = <&display_reserved>;
NAK.
Err :(,  please give me a chance to explain
Test your code against the bindings you send.
I can guarantee to you that I test may code more than twice. The code
used to testing is listed at link [1].
I wrote - test against the bindings. I don't believe that it was tested.
Please paste the output of the testing (dtbs_check).

I *do* run the test against the bindings and the test result say nothing.

I reset my modify today made, then re-run the test again.

I'm telling the truth: the test result say nothing. I paste the log at below:

make -j$(nproc) ARCH=loongarch CROSS_COMPILE=loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu- dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/loongson/loongson,display-controller.yaml dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/loongson/loongson,display-controller.yaml

  DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/loongson/loongson,display-controller.example.dts   DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/loongson/loongson,display-controller.example.dtb


I remember, if there anything wrong, rob's test robot will complain.

let's wait and witness.

This patchset  mainly used to illustrate how  we made the driver in [1]
usable on our SoC platform.

It's the same
patchset. You basically send something which the same moment is incorrect.
Loongson display controller IP has been integrated in both Loongson
North Bridge chipset(ls7a1000 and ls7a2000) and Loongson SoCs(ls2k1000
and ls2k2000 etc), it even has been included in Loongson BMC(ls2k0500 bmc)
products.
I don't understand how your reply here is relevant to incorrect bindings
or incorrect DTS according to bindings.

Ok, now I know that you refer to the bindings.

I'm a newbie at DT bindings, but i will correct all of the problem you mentioned.

It takes a few time, thanks for  your valuable advice.


Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux