On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:12:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 11:07:59PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:38:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:21 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer > > > > <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:16:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > ... > > > > > > are you ok with completly removing rbtx4938 support ? Can I rbtx4939 > > > > > board support, too ? > > > > > > > > Fine for me, I only have rbtx4927. > > > > > > Is there any news? I still see my patch well applied against latest Linux Next. > > > If the removal is going to be postponed, consider applying this patch then. So > > > we may move forward. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211130164558.85584-1-tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > The second patch in that series touches drivers/mtd so I'm waiting for > > a Acked-by. But I could apply the first patch... > > Yes, please! I've applied it, should show up in linux-next soon. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]