On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:16:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In order to get rid of legacy platform data in AT25 driver, > > > convert its users to use software nodes. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This looks good to me, thanks for cleaning this up! I think Geert has this > > hardware, adding him to Cc in case he wants to give it a spin. > > The SPI controller is only present on TX4938, not on TX4927, so it is > unused on my rbtx4927 board. > > > > arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/spi.h | 4 ++-- > > > arch/mips/txx9/generic/spi_eeprom.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++------------ > > > arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4938/setup.c | 6 +++--- > > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Probably all of this can be removed, given the SPI controller driver > itself was removed in commit 74523a5dae0c96d6 ("spi: txx9: Remove > driver")? are you ok with completly removing rbtx4938 support ? Can I rbtx4939 board support, too ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]